Confessions
of Jewelry Artists
We asked our jewelry-making readers
to step into the spotlight and answer our questions
by
June Culp Zeitner
|
This platinum
ring by David Liska illustrates a few of our readers' favorites:
a ring, in a geometric design style, set with a 5.83-ct. blue-green
tourmaline, cut by top cutter Michael Dyber. Photo: John Parrish.
|
Have you ever wondered what inspired certain people to become jewelry
makers for an avocation or career instead of more common hobbies
like woodwork or painting, or more common careers like engineering,
teaching, or the law? Or have you admired a jewelry display and
wondered what techniques the artists liked best and what they liked
the least? Or have you ever thought about what jewelry of the past
has influenced the jewelry you admire today?
A Lapidary Journal survey reveals the answers to these puzzles
and more. We compiled a random sample of jewelry makers among our
subscribers and sent them surveys ruthlessly interrogating them
as to their experience, their preferences, and how they learned
their craft. They supplied us with candid and revealing replies,
for which we are grateful. Having been a jewelry maker myself for
many years, I thought I could guess at most of the answers. How
wrong I was! (Well, I was right once in a while.)
Of the jewelry makers who answered our survey, 89 percent were
metalsmiths, and most of these were also lapidaries. Those who did
not check metalsmith or lapidary on the survey form were either
beaders, designers, gemologists, manufacturers, or collectors. Many
checked five, six, or even seven different choices -- a very versatile
crew!

Readers'
interest in beads is pretty evenly split between gem and glass
beads, such as this strand of lampworked beads by Karen Dougherty.
Photo: Michael Leslie. |
When we asked what jewelry techniques each respondent considered
to be his or her particular specialty, many answered silversmithing
-- which is somewhat vague -- but also followed up with more specific
techniques: casting, fabricating, enameling, etching, inlay, and
intarsia. Not as many mentioned forging, stone setting, metal plating,
goldsmithing, repousse, or making custom alloys. There were also
several wire wrappers, carvers, and beaders. One reader specializes
in making reproductions of fine Old World jewelry; another uses
precious metal clay; others chose married metals, metal weaving,
scrimshaw, overlay, or scrollwork. One experienced metalsmith makes
handmade precious metal chains. There were also lapidaries who cab
or facet stones for jewelry, and one who custom-tumbles jewelry
stones.
Apparently, our readers enjoy some techniques that don't fall
into their area of specialization. For instance, forging, which
didn't register very high among the techniques used most frequently
by our readers, had a greater than 50 percent response rate when
readers were asked which techniques they liked the most. Texturing,
hammering, and piercing also scored above the half-way mark, while
about 30 percent liked casting, channel inlay, and wire work. The
least-used methods are granulation, etching, engraving, scrollwork,
married metals, and mokume gane. Several readers cast their votes
for fusing and sculpting, but it was surprising that of all the
respondents, there was only one lonely vote for filigree, which
used to be a great favorite.
Overall, fabricated or constructed jewelry won over cast jewelry
by a large, three-to-one margin. Perhaps this is because casting
is usually more expensive, requiring more equipment, such as a burn-out
oven, and often taking much more time.

One of the
contemporary jewelry designers who has won the admiration of
our readers is Carrie Adell, who created this bead pendant of
18K shakudo, mokume gane, boulder opal, and diamonds. Photo:
Carrie Adell. |
STYLE CONSCIOUSNESS. Favorite kinds of jewelry? As I had anticipated,
contemporary was the overwhelming leader. Ethnic and ancient jewelry
styles tied for second, followed by another tie between Art Nouveau
and Art Deco.
Following close on the heels of that pack were Victorian, Egyptian,
Classical, and Baroque styles. Edwardian and 19th-century French
seemed not to enjoy great popularity, but Oriental, American Indian,
and Arts and Crafts styles all received write-ins.
As far as design is concerned, realistic and geometric design
styles proved slightly more attractive to our readers than naturalized
and stylized designs. Abstract designs and symbolic patterns were
close behind, but very few readers voted for impressionistic designs,
which were all the rage 100 years ago. Traditional and modern jewelry
tied for fourth place, but very few respondents would chose to buy
or make ultra-modern jewelry.
But once you've decided what design style you like the best, what
kind of jewelry do you apply that style to? The top four responses,
with very little difference in number of preferences, were rings,
pendants, earrings, and necklaces. Chains and bracelets tied for
fifth place, and bolas and buckles shared sixth. Cuff links, clips,
barrettes, and enhancers each were mentioned, but trailed far back
in the field.

These earrings
by Beth Solomon use silver, our readers' favorite metal, quartz
(in this case, gray drusy), our readers' favorite stone, and
pearls. Photo: Allen Bryan. |
When asked what their favorite metal is, our readers voted silver
by a landslide; silver received half again as many votes as gold.
One interpretation of this result (my own, thank you) is that many
of our metalsmiths are amateurs or hobbyists, since retail jewelry
stores still show gold as the most popular metal. Some readers named
copper as their favorite; platinum, brass, and refractory metals also
had their devotees.
WRITTEN IN STONES. What percentage of the jewelry you make
uses gemstones? Being totally entranced by gemstones myself, I was
happy to see that 16 percent of the readers surveyed use stones
in all of their jewelry and another 16 percent use stones in 90
percent of the items they make. Ten percent use stones in 85 percent
of their work and eight percent indicated they use stones 80 percent
of the time. Twelve percent estimated that they use gems for about
70 to 75 percent of their pieces, and most of the rest are near
50 percent. So over 60 percent of our jewelers use gems, and many
of them are lapidaries.
The majority, 78 percent, would want their jewelry stones to be
individually lapped, carved, faceted, or made into intarsia. Next
in preference were handmade beads and doublets or triplets. A few
favored laminated gem materials. Write-ins included drusy crystals
and natural botryoidal materials.
When asked to name their favorite stones for cabochons in jewelry,
our readers showed that quartz -- our all-American favorite -- is
still way out in front. Some mentioned agate, jasper, chrysoprase,
fire agate, chrysocolla-in-quartz, and plume agate. In addition
to the quartzes, opal, jade, and lapis registered as well. Gems
such as moonstone, labradorite, malachite, garnet, turquoise, sunstone,
rhodochrosite, sugilite, onyx, and paua shell also took a few votes.
A couple of readers answered "anything drusy" -- a good
answer as there are lots of exceptional drusy gem materials now
available.

Stones
loom large in the jewelry our readers' designs, with most preferring
individually cut and cabbed stones, such as these by cutter
Alex Horst. From left to right: drusy uvarovite garnet, chrysoprase,
and Louisiana petrified palmwood. Photo: Alex Horst. |
The best-loved cabochon cuts are still the old oval domed cabochons
every stone cutter learned on in the past, but creeping up on these
standards are bullets, tongues, and shields. Freeforms are much more
popular than in the past, and buff tops are gaining on the high domes.
A few readers preferred carved cabochons, such as cameos, scarabs,
seals, and intaglios -- there were several scrimshaw artists among
the respondents. One person enjoys fancy doublets and triplets most.
For faceted jewelry stones, the favorites are, in order: tourmaline,
corundum, amethyst, garnet, aquamarine, emerald, topaz, tanzanite,
diamond, citrine and other quartzes, peridot, opal, spinel, and
zircon. One person named alexandrite, another moldavite, and a third
person liked faceted synthetics best.
Among the favorite facet designs, the round brilliant is still
the leader, and second place is held by another classic, the emerald
or step cut. Other favorites are marquise, oval, pear, cushion,
heart, and fantasy cuts. Mentioned by only a few are such cuts as
princess, lozenge, kite, antique, and baguette. Barion and trilliant
each registered with a vote.
A question about our readers' interest in beads revealed that
the preference is split evenly between glass and gem beads. Millefiore
and lampworked glass beads were chosen more than other glass beads,
while hand-made or hand-carved gem beads took precedence over various
shapes, sizes, or colors of gem beads. After glass and stone, clay
beads emerged in a tie with enamel beads, slightly ahead of metal
beads. Antique beads, trade beads, and ethnic beads each had a few
dedicated followers, and a few stray voices supported Mexican beads,
jade beads, and Oriental pearls.

One
of the materials our readers are most interested in learning
more about is precious metal clay; this bracelet was made by
Peggy Johnson using silver PMC. Photo: Robert Diamante. |
GETTING PERSONAL. Things took a personal turn when
we asked, "If you make jewelry or are a collector of jewelry,
what influenced you to get started?" The answers showed,
as we had expected, that relatives and friends are of great
influence here. Some samples:
"My mother took a lapidary class when I was 6;"
"My grandfather took me rock hunting;" "My
father was a geologist and kept bringing pretty stones home
to me;" "My family took me to dig sapphires in Montana
when I was a child;" "A friend took me to his house
and showed me how to make a ring;" "I had a good
earth science teacher when I was in eighth grade." |
Some people were self-motivated: "I picked up a Lake Superior
agate when I was out fishing;" "I was a musician and home
maker. When I became disabled I transferred my skills to jewelry
making;" "I got a book about rocks for Christmas;"
"My husband was always making jewelry and I wanted to spend
more time with him;" "I had a lot of family birthdays
and anniversaries coming up and I wanted to give things I made myself
for each occasion; "I like to wear stunning original
jewelry and decided I could save money by learning to do it myself.
I learned, but I didn't save any money!"
One of the most neglected questions on the survey was one in which
we gave our readers a list of jewelry designers and asked them to
indicate the ones they most admired. Perhaps the non-response to
this question is due to many modern jewelry artists being so busy
at the work they enjoy that they are not well-steeped in the past
-- certainly it couldn't have been due to the obscurity of the jewelers
on the list: L.C. Tiffany, P.C. Faberge, S. Dali, R. Lalique, G.
Braque, A. Liberty, Paloma Picasso, G. Jensen, J. Schlumberger,
G. Foquet, L.F. Cartier, and W. Morris. Despite the less-than-total
response rate, we were given a clear indication of which jewelers
of the past still command the most admiration today: Tiffany, Faberge,
and Lalique.
Others who have their fans are Jensen, Cartier, and Dali.
Readers were more enthusiastic about recognizing the artistic
achievements of contemporary jewelry designers; jewelers who have
won the admiration of survey respondents are: John Paul Miller,
William Harper, Carrie Adell, Alan Revere, Dorothy Benrimo, Norah
Pierson, Jeff Wise, Stephanie Briggs, Jeff Ruett, Carolyn Morris
Bach, Matsuke Kambe Soellner, Luna Felix, Doug Feakes, Lanny Perry,
Karen Davidson, Ray Tracey, Charles Laloma, Paula Crevoshay, Sylvia
Nicks, Tim McCreight, J. McGrath, Bernd Munsteiner, Michael Boyd,
Charles Lewton-Brain, Rita Greer, Margaret Di Patta, Tewo Suuranen,
and Jeff Ruttlusa.
What piece of jewelry has made a lasting impression on you? The
one piece of jewelry that was mentioned the most was, perhaps not
surprisingly, one of the world's most famous, and seen by the most
people -- the
Hope Diamond. Next were Faberge's magnificent Imperial Easter
eggs. But most of the answers were as diverse as individual memories.
One reader will never forget an antique enamel dog pin. Others were
captivated by the jewelry from the ancient Spanish shipwreck Atocha
-- one chose a Trinity ring, another an elaborate chain, while a
third recalled emerald jewelry but couldn't remember the name of
the ship except "It starts with an 'A.'"
Museum exhibits of jewelry were memorable to many. An early jewelry
exhibit at the Minneapolis Institute of Art, a Chinese exhibit at
the Chicago Art Institute, an exhibit in Phoenix on contemporary
Native American jewelry were among those mentioned. One lady was
inspired by the Tiffany iris pin made with Yogo sapphires. Two people
marveled at separate pieces by Charles Laloma. Also cited were Zuni
and Maya exhibits, Russian boxes, Roman signet rings, and the Crown
Jewels of England.
After looking into the past, we asked our readers to gaze into
the future. What kind of jewelry did they see as becoming more important
in the future? Most predicted that pins will grow in importance,
while almost as many feel that one-of-a-kind pieces or limited editions
of unique jewelry will gain in favor over mass-produced jewelry.
Also in the running are Southwest jewelry, synthetic stone jewelry,
pendants, and handmade glass beads. There were single forecasts
for drusy items, computer designs, Yogo sapphire jewels, refractory
metals, and jewelry for men.
Although I know there are lots of great schools where jewelry
making and/or lapidary is taught, and many clubs with their own
workshops and classes, I had been under the impression that the
majority of jewelry makers working today had a minimum of formal
training. How wrong I was! An impressive 64 percent of our surveyed
readers have taken classes, some college level, and a few have degrees
or were art majors. Only 20 percent answered that they are self-taught.
Some learned from a friend or relative. Beaders replied they worked
on techniques by getting together with others interested in beading.
When asked what kind of jewelry they would like to learn more
about, a majority said they'd like to learn about specific techniques,
such as granulation, reticulation, roller printing, metal spinning,
or working with refractory metals, such as titanium. Eighteen percent
want to learn more about intarsia; 15 percent are eager to try fantasy
cuts; ten percent are interested in the new clays, precious metal
clay in particular; and seven percent would like to study lampworking
and dichroic glass. There were also scattered wishes for instructions
on electroforming, casting natural objects, studying contemporary
Native American work, and working with assembled materials.
The last question before the quiz -- (yes,
isn't there always a quiz?) is about books -- what jewelry books
have been read by participants? These were so numerous and so good
that I saved them for a bibliography (see "Readers'
Corner" box). A small number admitted to not having read
a jewelry book, but of these several wrote that the Lapidary Journal
has been their mentor. (Although I would urge them to expand their
library, I can't argue with their taste!)
|